What is the legal doctrine that permits liability without fault in Nevada?

The legal doctrine that allows for liability without fault in Nevada is known as strict liability. This doctrine means that a party can be held responsible for damages or injuries resulting from their actions or products, regardless of whether there was any intent to cause harm or any negligence involved. Strict liability typically applies in cases involving inherently dangerous activities or defective products, where the mere fact that an activity was conducted or a product was sold can lead to liability if harm results.

For example, if a manufacturer produces a defective product that causes injury to a consumer, the injured party may pursue a strict liability claim against the manufacturer without needing to prove that the manufacturer was negligent or acted recklessly. The focus is primarily on the act and its consequences rather than the actor's state of mind or their conduct.

In contrast, the other concepts listed do not embody the principle of liability without fault. Comparative fault assigns responsibility in proportion to the harm caused, vicarious liability holds one party accountable for the actions of another based on their relationship (such as employer/employee), and joint liability relates to multiple parties being held liable collectively. Each of these doctrines requires some level of fault or connection to the harm, which distinguishes them from strict liability.