What is the purpose of the Comparative Negligence Act in Nevada?

The purpose of the Comparative Negligence Act in Nevada is to fairly allocate damages based on each party's degree of fault. This principle acknowledges that in many personal injury cases, more than one party may be responsible for the harm that occurred. Under this act, the damages awarded to a plaintiff can be reduced in proportion to their own degree of negligence.

For example, if a plaintiff is found to be 20% at fault for their injuries and the total damages amount to $100,000, the plaintiff would receive only $80,000 after their share of negligence is deducted. This system encourages fairness by allowing courts to assign liability in a more nuanced way than traditional all-or-nothing negligence systems.

The other options do not accurately reflect the act's purpose. The act does not eliminate the need for trials, impose strict liability across the board, or solely limit claims for emotional distress. Instead, it ensures that all parties are held accountable relative to their level of fault, promoting a more balanced approach to damage recovery in negligence cases.