Which of the following represents "gross negligence" in Nevada law?

In Nevada law, gross negligence is defined as a severe lack of due care that demonstrates a blatant disregard for the safety and reasonable expectations of others. This means that the conduct significantly deviates from what would be considered acceptable and safe behavior in a given situation, leading to substantial harm or risk.

Option B correctly identifies this concept, as it emphasizes both the severity of the lack of care and its direct link to causing significant harm. Gross negligence often involves actions that are not just careless but are shown to be willfully negligent or recklessly indifferent to the consequences.

The other options fail to encapsulate the essence of gross negligence. A simple failure to act cautiously does not reach the level of severity required to be classified as gross negligence, as it may simply represent ordinary negligence or carelessness. An inadvertent error in decision-making also implies a lack of intent or recklessness, which does not satisfy the criteria for gross negligence. Lastly, a minor action that the average person would deem negligent suggests a level of behavior that is relatively minor and again does not align with the severity of actions typically categorized under gross negligence.

Thus, the correct option captures the critical factors of extreme carelessness and significant resultant harm that characterize gross negligence under Nevada law.